<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If it&#8217;s not grown, it has to be mined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/</link>
	<description>Reasonably green thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minh Saxfield</title>
		<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Minh Saxfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normbenson.com/timberati/?p=2461#comment-764</guid>
		<description>Have you ever considered adding more videos to your blog posts to keep the readers more entertained? I mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I&#039;m more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever considered adding more videos to your blog posts to keep the readers more entertained? I mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I&#8217;m more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Flood</title>
		<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>White Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normbenson.com/timberati/?p=2461#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Hey -  nice blog and impressive article... Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211;  nice blog and impressive article&#8230; Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#39;s Other Carbon Footprint &#124; Drakz News Station</title>
		<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#39;s Other Carbon Footprint &#124; Drakz News Station</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normbenson.com/timberati/?p=2461#comment-578</guid>
		<description>[...] here: TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#039;s Other Carbon Footprint   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#39;s Other Carbon Footprint   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timberati</title>
		<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Timberati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normbenson.com/timberati/?p=2461#comment-574</guid>
		<description>As an example of technology&#039;s footprint, if one buys an ereader, one must buy it for the convenience, not because it &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt; save paper (though probably won&#039;t save any paper). My back-of-the-envelope calculation[1] leads me to believe that each Kindle, mobile phone, etc., leave about 100-200 pounds of toxic garbage in its wake. Our carbon footprint is more than CO2, it includes CN (cyanide).
 
Does the item&#039;s convenience outweigh the cost? Forests return. Plastics and cyanide dumps don’t go away.

Ereader don&#039;t save paper either. Since Kindle debuted, Amazon is selling more books. Amazon&#039;s CEO, Jeff Bezos told attendees at the 2008 BookExpo America, an annual bookseller’s tradeshow, “After purchasing Kindle, customers continue to purchase the same number of physical books that they bought before buying their Kindle, but altogether…their [ebook plus physical] book purchases on Amazon increased by a factor of 2.6.”
 

For more, read &lt;a href=&quot;http://normbenson.com/timberati/2008/11/23/save-trees-use-more-paper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Save Trees, Use More Paper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://normbenson.com/timberati/2009/06/11/the-cost-of-living/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Paper or Plastic?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

1. Calculation is based on the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.noah.dk/baeredygtig/rucksack/rucksack.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ecological Rucksack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; developed by the Danish Friends of the Earth, another estimate from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthworksaction.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Earthworks&lt;/a&gt;, the PBS Frontline report, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/peru404/environmental.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Toxic Shimmer of Gold&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;; and Dr. Robert Moran’s paper on the Chemistry, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthworksaction.org/pubs/morancyanidepaper.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Toxicity and Analysis of Mining-Related Waters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.etoxics.org/site/PageServer?pagename=svtc_toxics_in_electronics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Toxics in Electronics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an example of technology&#8217;s footprint, if one buys an ereader, one must buy it for the convenience, not because it <em>might</em> save paper (though probably won&#8217;t save any paper). My back-of-the-envelope calculation[1] leads me to believe that each Kindle, mobile phone, etc., leave about 100-200 pounds of toxic garbage in its wake. Our carbon footprint is more than CO2, it includes CN (cyanide).</p>
<p>Does the item&#8217;s convenience outweigh the cost? Forests return. Plastics and cyanide dumps don’t go away.</p>
<p>Ereader don&#8217;t save paper either. Since Kindle debuted, Amazon is selling more books. Amazon&#8217;s CEO, Jeff Bezos told attendees at the 2008 BookExpo America, an annual bookseller’s tradeshow, “After purchasing Kindle, customers continue to purchase the same number of physical books that they bought before buying their Kindle, but altogether…their [ebook plus physical] book purchases on Amazon increased by a factor of 2.6.”</p>
<p>For more, read <a href="http://normbenson.com/timberati/2008/11/23/save-trees-use-more-paper/" rel="nofollow"><em>Save Trees, Use More Paper</em></a> and <a href="http://normbenson.com/timberati/2009/06/11/the-cost-of-living/" rel="nofollow"><i>Paper or Plastic?</i></a></p>
<p>1. Calculation is based on the <i><a href="http://www.noah.dk/baeredygtig/rucksack/rucksack.pdf" rel="nofollow">Ecological Rucksack</a></i> developed by the Danish Friends of the Earth, another estimate from <a href="http://www.earthworksaction.org/" rel="nofollow">Earthworks</a>, the PBS Frontline report, <i><a href="http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/peru404/environmental.html" rel="nofollow">The Toxic Shimmer of Gold</a></i>; and Dr. Robert Moran’s paper on the Chemistry, <i><a href="http://www.earthworksaction.org/pubs/morancyanidepaper.pdf" rel="nofollow">Toxicity and Analysis of Mining-Related Waters</a></i>, and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, <i><a href="http://www.etoxics.org/site/PageServer?pagename=svtc_toxics_in_electronics" rel="nofollow">Toxics in Electronics</a></i>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology’s Other Carbon Footprint -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://normbenson.com/timberati/2010/01/30/digging-technology/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology’s Other Carbon Footprint -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normbenson.com/timberati/?p=2461#comment-573</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by EarthAdapt and Manuel Rivera, Brady Cullens. Brady Cullens said: TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#039;s Other Carbon Footprint: [i] E-readers are handy electronic devices, they can hol... http://bit.ly/blTOTd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by EarthAdapt and Manuel Rivera, Brady Cullens. Brady Cullens said: TIMBERATI » Cyanide: Technology&#39;s Other Carbon Footprint: [i] E-readers are handy electronic devices, they can hol&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/blTOTd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/blTOTd</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

