Division of Drinking Water Attn: Jeanine Townsend, Clerk to the Board State Water Resources Control Board P.O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 Re: Comment Letter – SBDDW-20-001: Perchlorate DLR It’s clear the California State Water Resources Control Board cares very much about providing the cleanest drinking water to the most vulnerable consumers, children. Yet theContinue reading “Open Letter to California’s Water Board Regarding Perchlorate”
Author Archives: Norm Benson
California’s State Water Board is gnawing on the perchlorate bone, again.
Chemaphobia thrives at California’s State Water Board. The State Water Resources Control Board is accepting written public comments on proposed changes to the draft Perchlorate Detection Limit for Purposes of Reporting (DLR). The public comment period ends on 7 August 2020, at 12:00 p.m. (noon). The Notice of Public Availability of Changes, proposed regulationContinue reading “California’s State Water Board is gnawing on the perchlorate bone, again.”
Bloomingcamp Ranch vs California’s Water Board
I did more research. More contemplation. I reworked the letter to be less confrontational. More flies with honey than vinegar and all that… By the way should you wish to comment… SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS. Persons interested in the draft order are encouraged to submit comments electronically. Comment letters must be received by 12:00 noonContinue reading “Bloomingcamp Ranch vs California’s Water Board”
Open Comment Letter to California Water Board – Draft Order Bloomingcamp Water System
I’m planning to send this letter to California’s State Water Resources Control Board in regard to the Bloomingcamp Ranch water system. I invite anyone interested to do the same. You are welcome to borrow what you wish in order to write to the Water Board. Comments must be received by the Water Board by noonContinue reading “Open Comment Letter to California Water Board – Draft Order Bloomingcamp Water System”
Bloomingcamp Ranch vs the State of California, Part 2
There is a whiff of bullshit and boot polish in the air. Politics, as opposed to science, does not reward the correction of mistakes, given that correcting a mistake also entails admitting to having made one. Worse, the bigger the mistake, the greater the political urgency of defending it at all costs. – novelist LionelContinue reading “Bloomingcamp Ranch vs the State of California, Part 2”
Bloomingcamp Ranch vs the State of California
On May 21, 2020, subscribers to the State Water Resources Control Board listserver received a message from the State Water Resources Control Board: This is a message from the State Water Resources Control Board. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) will accept written comments on the draft Order Denying Petitions for ReconsiderationContinue reading “Bloomingcamp Ranch vs the State of California”
State Water Resources Control Board Considers New Perchlorate Detection Limit for Purposes of Reporting
California’s Division of Drinking Water of the State Water Resources Control Board wishes to change the Detection Limits for Purposes of Reporting (DLRs) for perchlorate from .004 (4 ?g/l ) to 0.002 (2 ?g/l) . Here is their announcement: The Division of Drinking Water (DDW), at a July 5, 2017 public hearing, presented to the StateContinue reading “State Water Resources Control Board Considers New Perchlorate Detection Limit for Purposes of Reporting”
How Science Guess Becomes Science Fact
Hello, ideas. Welcome to the Hunger Games! May the odds be ever in your favor. Science is under attack. Not breaking news, we can see for ourselves that it is. Right? You have heard, “We don’t have time. The science is settled. We must act now!” yes? If it’s settled, what is it and howContinue reading “How Science Guess Becomes Science Fact”
How Science Guess Becomes Science Fact
Welcome to the Hunger Games, ideas! And may the odds be ever in your favor. Science is under attack. Not breaking news, we can see for ourselves that it is. Right? You have heard, “We don’t have time. The science is settled. We must act now!” yes? If it’s settled, what is it and howContinue reading “How Science Guess Becomes Science Fact”
What are “reasonable efforts” to restore habitat? Supreme Court argument highlights the importance of who pays to recover endangered species
Originally posted on FREEcology:
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, concerning the agency’s authority to designate land as critical habitat if it isn’t even habitat in its present condition. Recognizing that such a power could easily be abused, the short-handed court…
