Weekend Postcard: Boggs Mountain State Forest


Winter is on its way in the northern hemisphere. Make sure to clear all those things that are meant to channel water: culverts, ditches, eaves, and the like. An ounce of prevention saves a ton of rock fill.

If memory serves, this damage happened on Boggs Road 400 above Spikenard Creek near John’s Trail. (see map below) I and a volunteer went out in a torrential rainstorm opening culverts, clearing inside ditches, with shovels. We just couldn’t be everywhere at once on the state forest’s 26 miles of dirt roads.

For a copy of the new Boggs Mountain State Forest map (PDF) go here.

Boggs Mtn State Forest (click to enlarge & use back arrow to return)

This Week’s Environmental News Roundup

Here’s a list of the previous week’s stories that were interesting (to me at least). Are there any others that you think should be on the list? Please leave a comment.

Convention on Biodiversity meets in Nagoya, Japan

Ever since the United Nations’ 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, delegates have met periodically to assess the health of the earth. Because, well, we sort of depend on the earth and, second, it’s really great to get together and stay in plush hotels in tourist destinations. This year the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) (which was spawned by the Earth Summit) met in Nagoya, Japan for Nagoya 10. According to the source of knowledge these days, Wikipedia, The Convention has three main goals:

  1. conservation of biological diversity (or biodiversity);
  2. sustainable use of its components; and
  3. fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources

Spiegel online says, “The countries present in Nagoya have all recognized the need for global nature conservation, but they are pursuing starkly different interests. Developing nations are expecting incentives to protect and care for their biological treasure troves. For their part, rich industrialized nations are seeking to keep the costs for that as low as possible…”

The goals of this session’s negotiations are:

  • A new “strategic plan” for global protection of nature between 2011 and 2020, including a minimization of – overfishing, deforestation and extinctions of species.
  • A finance plan for conservation projects.
  • A plan on valuation of and compensation for ecosystem services

Fred Pearce writing for New Scientist says the negotiations are not going smoothly. In fact, talks “could be going the way of the climate change talks in Denmark in December 2009…Several countries with the richest biodiversity, such as Brazil, are this week refusing to sign up to new targets unless there is also a deal on sharing the cash benefits from the exploitation of their genetic resources by western corporations such as drugs companies. Western countries see that as a blank cheque they won’t sign.”

James Fahn agrees, “The failure of Copenhagen hangs over Nagoya, and even the star power of Hollywood may not be able to dispel the gloom here. The challenge of conserving biodiversity is enormous: the latest results of the IUCN Red List, an annual checkup on the health of the world’s vertebrate species, has revealed that around one fifth of them are threatened with extinction.”

The talks may be unproductive for another reason. James Delingpole, writing in the UK Telegraph thinks so. These talks, like the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), are a complete waste of money and time because technocrats fabricated the crisis: “And so it begins. With all the shamelessness of a Goldman Sachser trading in his middle-aged wife for a hot, pouting twentysomething called Ivanka, the green movement is ditching ‘Climate Change’. The newer, younger, sexier model’s name? Biodiversity…When I say shameless, I’m talking so amoral it makes the Whore of Babylon look like Mother Theresa; so flagrant it makes Al Gore’s, ahem, alleged drunken ‘Love poodle’ assault on the Portland Masseuse look like an especially delicate passage from Andreas Capellanus’s The Art of Courtly Love…Sure it will go on, churning out Assessment Report after Assessment Report, bringing pots of money to the usual gang of bent scientists prepared to act as lead authors. But the world’s mainstream media – especially all those environment correspondents who so lovingly transcribe the press releases of Greenpeace and the WWF as if they were holy writ – will have moved on [from the IPCC], according to the dictates of the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) fashionable crise du jour.”

“Should the CBD be scrapped?” asks The Economist magazine: “It is tempting to say yes when it comes up with overblown, unobtainable targets, such as stopping all extinctions anywhere, or when it entertains foolish proposals, like the current Luddite idea to restrict all forms of research exploring the possibility of “geoengineering” the climate. But when it sticks to achievable, measurable targets, such as increasing the area of nature reserves in the ocean, it can provide a useful focus. And an occasional talking shopis useful for donors to compare projects and see which work best. As conservationists like to say, every niche is valuable. But back local pragmatism, not Utopian dreams.”

Update: The CBD has announced goals to reduce the earth’s extinction rate
The NY Times story says, “The agreement, known as the Nagoya Protocol, sets a goal of cutting the current extinction rate by half or more by 2020…The new targets include increasing the amount of protected land to 17 percent, from the current figure of about 12.5 percent, and protected oceans to 10 percent, from less than 1 percent. The protocol also includes commitments of financing, still somewhat murky, from richer countries to help poorer nations reach these goals”

More new species discovered

The world seems to be gaining species nearly as quickly as the CBD says we are losing them. The UK’s Telelgraph says, “More than 1,200 new species of plants and vertebrates have been discovered in the Amazon over the past decade – a new species every three days – according to a new WWF report, Amazon Alive! that summarises discoveries between 1999 and 2009. The new species include 637 plants, 257 fish, 216 amphibians, 55 reptiles, 16 birds and 39 mammals, confirming that the Amazon is one of the most diverse places on Earth.”

Click here to see pictures of the newly discovered animals

There’s gold in them ecosystems

As an offshoot of CBD, the World Bank has begun a 5-year pilot project to monetize ecosystems. “If we are going to address the alarming loss of habitat and the degradation of ecosystems in the world, we have to properly value natural capital,” said Warren Evans, the World Bank’s Director of Environment to CNN. “That means putting the tools in the hands of finance ministers so that they have a full economic picture of what their countries’ assets are worth. Then they will see the value of preserving versus one of exploitation of natural resources,” he said.

The BBC notes, “The partnership was launched at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) meeting in Nagoya, Japan…The new project aims to pick up conclusions of a recent UN-backed project on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (Teeb), and help governments turn them into policy. Teeb’s headline conclusion was that degradation of the natural world is costing the global economy $2-5 trillion (£1.3-3.2bn) per year.”

The idea that eco-services provide economic benefit pits top-down regulation-centric greens against bottom-up libertarians (and many economists) who see such needs as a failure of markets. Property rights and adequate infrastructure will be needed to stop much of the environmental degradation that underlies the worries about high rate species loss. James Salzman (the Samuel F. Mordecai Professor of Law and the Nicholas Institute Professor of Environmental Policy at Duke University) writes, “For decades the solution to environmental protection has been government action. Today, knowledge about environmental processes combined with increased environmental sensitivity provides opportunities for entrepreneurs to find innovative ways of developing markets for ecosystem services.” To read more of Salzman click here to read “Designing Payments for Ecosystem Services.”

Plants do great job cleaning up after us

UCAR photo by Carlye Calvin

University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, BOULDER—Vegetation plays an unexpectedly large role in cleansing the atmosphere, a new study finds. The research, led by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), uses observations, gene expression studies, and computer modeling to show that deciduous plants absorb about a third more of a common class of air polluting chemicals than previously thought. Plants play a significant role in absorbing certain pollutants.

“Plants clean our air to a greater extent than we had realized,” says NCAR scientist Thomas Karl, the lead author. “They actively consume certain types of air pollution.”

Click here for more from UCAR on the NCAR study

Everglades water quality improving

According to a report published in the September-October 2010 Journal of Environmental Quality, phosphorus and nitrogen levels have declined in the water in the Everglades, indicating an improvement in overall water quality, especially since the 1970’s. Better management practices were put into use in the 1990s in the Everglades Agricultural Area and various urban areas and  regulate and diminished the impact of humans.

See American Society of Agronomy (ASA) news release for more.

Halliburton and BP Knew of Cement Flaws Before Deepwater Horizon Explosion

The chief investigator of the presidential commission investigating the Deepwater Horizon disaster and subsequent well blowout says that the cement used to secure the well casing failed. As part of the investigation Halliburton, the supplier of the cement used in the Macondo well, provided investigators with samples comparable to those used at the Deepwater Horizon site. Halliburton agreed that the Chevron lab was highly qualified for this work. In his letter to the commissioners, he says, “Chevron’s report states, among other things, that its lab personnel were unable to generate stable foam cement in the laboratory using the materials provided by Halliburton and available design information regarding the slurry used at the Macondo well. Although laboratory foam stability tests cannot replicate field conditions perfectly, these data strongly suggest that the foam cement used at Macondo was unstable.” Then in typical bureaucratic understatement he concludes, “This may have contributed to the blowout.” D’ya think?

He ends his letter to the commissioners, “Finally, we want to emphasize that even if our concerns regarding the foam slurry design at Macondo are well founded, the story of the blowout does not turn solely on the quality of the Macondo cement job. Cementing wells is a complex endeavor and industry experts inform us that cementing failures are not uncommon even in the best of circumstances. Because it may be anticipated that a particular cement job may be faulty, the oil industry has developed tests, such as the negative pressure test and cement evaluation logs, to identify cementing failures. It has also developed methods to remedy deficient cement jobs.”

NY Times story here.

Uganda buys into biofuels

The story from Uganda’s Daily Monitor doesn’t say how the biofuels would be produced. It is clear that they believe that buying oil will save them money (which I am highly skeptical of), “For Uganda, bio-diesel production, if taken to commercial level can save a capital outflow estimated at $230m spent on importing over 400,000,000 litres of diesel per annum.”

Herdsmen turn Jinja airfield into grazing ground

Also in Ugandan news, “[Uganda’s] joint transport sector review committee was on Tuesday astounded to learn that the Jinja airfield has fallen prey to herdsmen who break the fence to graze their cattle.” According to the Ugandan Daily Monitor story, the Jinja airport’s “grassed area should be replaced with concrete.”

NASA Software to save Airlines’ Fuel Costs

“Direct-To” is a product of NASA aeronautics research. The NASA news release says that Boeing Company intends to adopt the software and provide it through a subscription to airlines. Direct-To enables airlines to save fuel and reduce emissions by automatically identifying flight route shortcuts that are wind-favorable and acceptable to air traffic controllers. [click here for more information]

Amtrak Orders Fuel Saving Locomotives

As part of a comprehensive plan to modernize and expand its fleet of equipment, Amtrak is buying 70 new electric locomotives from Siemens as it retires older models. The new locomotives will have regenerative braking systems that can automatically return electricity to the power grid. The Amtrak Cities Sprinter ACS-64 electric locomotive is to be delivered in February 2013 and will operate at speeds up to 125 mph (201 kph) on the Northeast Corridor from Washington, D.C. to Boston and up to 110 mph (177 kph) on the Keystone Corridor from Philadelphia to Harrisburg, Pa. They will replace locomotives in service between 20 and 30 years with average mileage of 3.5 million miles traveled.

The New York Times Green blog points out in its story, “Moving a passenger by train is already more energy-efficient than doing so by car or plane, government statistics show: about 2,134 B.T.U.’s per mile for an Amtrak train, versus 3,578 per mile for a passenger car at an average level of occupancy and 3,942 by plane for domestic trips, based on 2000 estimates.”

This Week’s Environmental News Roundup

Here’s a list of the previous week’s stories that were interesting (to me at least). Are there any others that you think should be on the list? Leave a comment.

EPA approves more pollution and higher food prices

On October 13, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today waived the limitation on selling fuel that is more than 10 percent ethanol for model year 2007 and newer cars and light trucks. The waiver applies to fuel that contains up to 15 percent ethanol – known as E15 – and only to model year 2007 and newer cars and light trucks. This represents the first of a number of actions that are needed from federal, state and industry towards commercialization of E15 gasoline blends. EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson made the decision after a review of the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) extensive testing and other available data on E15’s impact on engine durability and emissions.  “Thorough testing has now shown that E15 does not harm emissions control equipment in newer cars and light trucks,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Wherever sound science and the law support steps to allow more home-grown fuels in America’s vehicles, this administration takes those steps.” (Source: EPA news release)

Home grown energy sounds good for energy independence. Well, “what does it do to our wallets?” asks Gregg Easterbrook. “Ethanol from genetically engineered dwarf trees or tall grasses holds tremendous promise as a cost-effective, greenhouse-neutral fuel. But for today, nearly all ethanol sold in the United States is made from corn. Domestically produced corn-based ethanol is subsidized via federal payments to grain farmers, by refinery tax exemptions for fuel containing domestic ethanol, and by tariff barriers intended to prevent Brazilian sugar-based ethanol from entering the country. Annual federal subsidies to corn ethanol cost around $5 billion. Are the benefits worth that?”

The New York Times story noted, “The fuel itself gets a mixed reception from environmental advocates. Ethanol production consumes prodigious quantities of natural gas, diesel fuel and other inputs that lead to carbon dioxide emissions.” And, “Ethanol also evaporates more easily than gasoline, which can put an ingredient of smog into the air.”

Not only is it expensive but it takes food from the poorest people. Robert Bryce at the Energy Tribune quotes the Earth Policy Institute (EPI), “(EPI) reports that in 2009, US ethanol distilleries consumed 107 million tons of grain. That amounts to more than 25% of total US grain production. That quantity of grain, says EPI, ‘was enough to feed 330 million people for one year at average world consumption levels.'” In fact, “the amount of grain needed to produce enough ethanol to fill the tank of an SUV one time could “feed one person for an entire year.”’

“Continuing to divert more food to fuel, as is now mandated by the U.S. federal government in its Renewable Fuel Standard,” says the EPI, “will likely only reinforce the disturbing rise in hunger. By subsidizing the production of ethanol, now to the tune of some $6 billion each year, U.S. taxpayers are in effect subsidizing rising food bills at home and around the world.”

Canada declares BPA toxic

Bisphenol  (BPA) is a chemical used to line food cans, and make some hard plastic containers and toys. BPA has formally been declared a toxic substance by Canadian authorities. (Source: CBC News) This step will make regulation of the the substance easier. Given that BPA had been found in the urine of 91 per cent of Canadians aged 6 to 79 and animal studies were “quite concerning,” “Health Canada considers that sufficient evidence relating to human health has been presented to justify the conclusion that bisphenol A is harmful to human life and should be added to Schedule 1 of [the Canadian Environmental Protection Act].”

The Minister of the Environment’s order notes, “Bisphenol A is an industrial chemical used to make a hard, clear plastic such as polycarbonate, which is used in many consumer products, including reusable water bottles and baby bottles. Bisphenol A is also used in the manufacture of epoxy resins, which act as a protective lining on the inside of metal-based food and beverage cans. Polycarbonates have wide application in consumer products (e.g. repeat-use polycarbonate containers), in medical devices, glazing applications, film and the electronics industry, while epoxy resins are used in protective coatings, structural composites, electrical laminates and as adhesives and sealants.”

This declaration has some mystified. “Just days after the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) once again confirmed that BPA is safe for use in food-contact items, Environment Canada’s announcement is contrary to the weight of worldwide scientific evidence, unwarranted and will unnecessarily confuse and alarm the public,” said Steven G. Hentges of the [American Chemistry Council]‘s Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group. (Source: Reuters)

MIT oped says global warming is “not worth the fight”

“Global warming is real. It is predominantly anthropogenic. Left unchecked, it will likely warm the earth by 3-7 C by the end of the century. What should the United States do about it?” asks Keith Yost, Staff Columnist for MIT’s The Tech newspaper. His answer is, “Very little, if anything at all… unilateral action will not mitigate climate change…To act unilaterally, or even in conjunction with the [Annex 1 countries], would mean paying the full measure of mitigating climate change while receiving only a fraction of its benefit. It is tempting to play the crusader, to make some moral, if futile stand in defense of our current thermostat setting. But we must be realistic.”

Steelhead trout numbers up in California

According to an Associated Press story in the Sacramento Bee, steelhead trout populations may be on the rise in California. “Santa Cruz water resource manager Chris Perry says this year’s numbers bode well for a steelhead population that once boomed along the Central Coast. In 1997, the fish was listed as threatened species.” Steelhead are an ocean-going rainbow trout (anadromous salmonid fish) which hatches in a freshwater stream or river then travels to the sea to mature and returns to the place they hatched to spawn.

Welcome Back, Otter

Otters have increased their numbers in England after being close to extinction, reports the BBC. “In many watercourses in the south-west and along the River Wye otter numbers are at maximum capacity.” Paul Raven, head of conservation and ecology at the Environment Agency, said: “The recovery of otters from near-extinction shows how far we’ve come in controlling pollution and improving water quality.”

Judge backs prairie dogs

In other rodent news, the New York Times has an article about a 74-year-old rancher, Larry Haverfield, who took county officials to court challenging a 100-year-old Kansas law which gave them the right to come on his or anyone’s property and eradicate prairie dogs when they deemed it necessary. “Numbering about 25,000 prairie dogs in far western Kansas, the colony (on Haverfield’s ranch) is a prime source of food for one of the most endangered mammals in the world, the black-footed ferret…In 2007, estranged from neighbors and fighting the county commission, he (Haverfield) allowed the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to release endangered black-footed ferrets on his property as part of a program to increase their population.” In his ruling, District Judge Jack Lively said that the U.S. endangered Species Act superseded state law, and exterminating prairie dogs would put the black-footed ferret at risk.

Ugandan President Museveni tells Buliisa District residents to eat the crocs before the crocs eat them

Uganda’s Daily Monitor reports, ‘”President Museveni has advised Buliisa District residents to eat crocodiles that have been tormenting them…“If these crocodiles are killing your people, you can also learn to eat them.” Mr Museveni said his office can facilitate Buliisa residents to study from communities that have prospered from crocodiles. “You can go for a study tour in Buwama, Mpigi District, where there is a farm operated by Zimbabweans. They get hides besides eating crocodile meat,” he said amidst a huge applause from the crowd that turned up for the rally (at Butiaba Primary School in Butiaba Sub-county).’

Is Africa turning its back on a green revolution?

The International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) says that West African farmers do not like what Kofi Annan’s AGRA (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa) is selling. What AGRA is selling is principally the tenets of Dr. Norman Borlaug’s Green Revolution: hybridized seeds, irrigation, and chemical pesticides and fertilizers for farmers. The West African farmers cannot and should not be forced by anyone to use fertilizer or genetically enhanced seeds or any other modern farming method. Yet, the Green Revolution transformed Asia. Why would they want to turn their backs on proven techniques?

“Food and agriculture policy and research tend to ignore the values, needs, knowledge and concerns of the very people who provide the food we all eat — and often serve instead powerful commercial interests such as multinational seed and food retailing companies,” says project leader Dr Michel Pimbert of IIED. “There is a clear vision from these small farmers. They are rejecting the approach of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.”

Farmers, pastoralists, food processors and consumers from Mali, Senegal, Burkina Faso and Benin listened to experts and then, according to IIED, called for “direct involvement in the design and implementation of agricultural research. Among other things, they said research should focus on improving the productivity of local crop varieties and farming practices such as seed sharing instead of moving towards more intensive farming that relies on hybrid seeds and expensive external inputs,” said Pimbert.

“We are choosing to invest in what we believe will work,” said Sylvia Mathews Burwell, a member of the AGRA board. According to the article in AllAfrica.com, “AGRA is putting its funding in the development of new seed varieties such as drought-tolerant maize, improving soil fertility and market access and farmer education.”

I guess I should not be surprised that West African farmers wish to use local seed, apply little or no chemical fertilizer (because chemicals are expensive), and have research show them how to achieve greater yields using local seed and little fertilization. Many Americans believe that we can pay less in taxes and exceed the present benefits provided by the government (Medicare and Social Security come to mind).

Governments and farmers have objected before to modified exotic seeds and nontraditional cultivation methods on ideological grounds. As Matt Ridley documents in his book The Rational Optimist, “Between 1963 and 1966, Borlaug and his Mexican dwarf wheat faced innumerable hurdles to acceptance in Pakistan and India. Jealous local researchers deliberately under-fertilised the experimental plots…The Indian state grain monopolies lobbied against the seeds, spreading rumours that they were susceptible to disease…But gradually, thanks to Borlaug’s persistence, the Mexican dwarf wheat prevailed. The Pakistani agriculture minister took to the radio extolling the new varieties. The Indian agriculture minister ploughed and planted his cricket pitch.”

Yet in 1968, Ridley writes, “there were not enough people, bullock carts, trucks or storage facilities to cope with the crop. In some towns grain was stored in schools.” While the seed was pivotal–Borlaug’s Mexican dwarf wheat didn’t fall over and ‘lodge’ when well fertilized–the real key was nitrogen provided by fertilizer. And the key to the nitrogen was fossil fuel. The nitrogen in the fertilizer came from the air and was combined with water gas to make ammonia–the Haber-Bosch process–the cheapest method of nitrogen fixation.

“Since 1900,” Ridley writes, “the world has increased its population by 400 per cent; its cropland area by 30 per cent; its average yields by 400 per cent and its total crop harvest by 600 per cent. So per capita food production has risen by 50 per cent. Great news – thanks to fossil fuels.”

Borlaug had little use for elitism, “If they [academics, theorists, environmental lobbyists] lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they’d be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things.”

The IIED process has the whiff of neo-Lysenkoism, don’t you think?

Update:

About increasing farm yields, Ronald Bailey notes (on the topic of overpopulation) on the Reason.com site:

Applying modern agricultural technologies more widely would go a long way toward boosting yields. For example, University of Minnesota biologist Ronald Phillips points out that India produces 31 bushels of corn per acre now which is at the same point U.S. yields were in the 1930s. Similarly, South Africa produces 40 bushels (U.S. 1940s yields); Brazil 58 bushels (U.S. 1950s yields); China 85 bushels (U.S. 1960s yields). Today’s modern biotech hybrids regularly produce more than 160 bushels of corn per acre in the Midwest. For what it’s worth, the corporate agriculture giant Monsanto is aiming to double yields on corn, soybeans, and cotton by 2030. Whether or not specific countries will be able to feed themselves has less to do with their population growth than it does with whether they adopt policies that retard their economic growth.

A regulated forest

What makes for a regulated forest?

A “regulated forest” consists of tree sizes in approximately equal parts (and age classes that correspond to the size classes). As the trees in a stand grow into the harvestable age class, equal volumes may be harvested at roughly equal intervals.

This represents a regulated (sustained-yield) forest before and after a timber harvest. The zero square on the right will be restocked.

Meyer (1961) says, it is

“the organization and control of growing stock for a sustained yield of forest products from a specific forest area.”

Dr. Kenneth Davis of the University of Michigan wrote in his 1954 text American Forest Management,

“The essential requirement of a fully regulated forest is that age and size classes be represented in such proportion and be consistently growing at such rates that an approximately equal annual or periodic yield of products of desired size and quality may be obtained.” – Source: forestry.alaska.gov

The reasons to regulate forest yield

According to Dietmar Rose and Howard Hoganson (1989),

Economic, social, and administrative factors drive the need for sustained-yield. Regulated forests provide a:

  • Yearly cut of approximate equal volume, size, quality, and value of timber implies a stable business planning base ad workload continuity.
  • Current growth (harvested) and income not larger than necessary.
  • Balance between yearly expenditures and receipts (liquidity)
  • High degree of safety from fire, insects, and diseases.

For more, I have blogged about regulating forests here and here.

Weekend postcards – Santa Catalina Island

I thought I would share some more pictures of California’s Channel IslandsSanta Catalina Island.

Boats in harbor at Emerald Bay
To stave off a timber famine, Californians planted Eucalyptus in the late 1800

.

Sunrise on Emerald bay, Catalina Island
Boats in the harbor at
Emerald Bay staff say Big Olaf

The Week’s Environmental News roundup

New species of carnivorous mammal found in Madagascar

A mongoose-like creature has been discovered in Madagascar, BBC reports to http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_9080000/9080783.stm

Leicester Geographers forensically tap pee ancient deposits to learn about desert area’s climatic changes

According to the media release, issued by the University of Leicester Press Office,

Scientists at the University of Leicester are using an unusual resource to investigate ancient climates– prehistoric animal urine.

The animal in question is the rock hyrax, a common species in countries such as Namibia and Botswana. They look like large guinea pigs but are actually related to the elephant. Hyraxes use specific locations as communal toilets, some of which have been used by generations of animals for thousands of years. The urine crystallises and builds up in stratified accumulations known as ‘middens’, providing a previously untapped resource for studying long-term climate change.

“Palaeoenvironmental records in this area were fragmentary,” says a researcher. “The middens are providing unique terrestrial records to compare against nearby deep ocean-core records, allowing us to think in much more detail about what drives African climate change.

“This is a very dynamic environment, and it appears that that the region’s climate changed in a complex manner during and after the last global Ice Age (around 20,000 years ago). The next step, which is part of Dr Chase’s new research project, will be to compare the midden data against simulations of past climates generated by GCMs [computer-based general circulation models that are used to simulate both past and future climates] to evaluate their performance and explore why climates have changed the way they have.”

Brazil’s Amazon forest to be auctioned off

According to Reuters, “Brazil will auction large swaths of the Amazon forest to be managed by private timber companies and cooperatives to help reduce demand for illegal logging…The government will grant private companies logging concessions for nearly 1 million hectares (2.47 million) by year-end and, within 4 to 5 years, nearly 11 million hectares (27 million acres), the size of the U.S. state of Virginia.

The earth’s biodiversity probably still increasing

Hélène Morlon, Matthew D. Potts, and Joshua B. Plotkin from the University of Pennsylvania and UC Berkeley write in the excitingly titled paper, “Inferring the Dynamics of Diversification: A Coalescent Approach,”

We have developed a novel approach to infer diversification dynamics from the phylogenies of present-day species. Applying our approach to a diverse set of empirical phylogenies, we demonstrate that speciation rates have decayed over time, suggesting ecological constraints to diversification. Nonetheless, we find that diversity is still expanding at present, suggesting either that these ecological constraints do not impose an upper limit to diversity or that this upper limit has not yet been reached. [emphasis added]

200 new species found in Papua New Guinea

Last week we noted that 6,000 new species had been found in the earth’s oceans, this week it’s 200 new species in PNG. “Scientists Wednesday unveiled a spectacular array of more than
200 new species discovered in the Pacific islands of Papua New Guinea, including a white-tailed mouse and a tiny, long-snouted frog.” Said researcher Steve Richards, “To find a completely new genus of mammal in this day and age is pretty cool.”

US Interior Secretary lifts gulf drilling moratorium

According to a story in Marketwatch,

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar on Tuesday said the deepwater drilling moratorium has been lifted ahead of the Nov. 30 expiration, saying progress has been made on making deepwater drilling safer. The moratorium was imposed after a BP well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded, leading to the worst oil spill in U.S. history. “There will always be risks associated with deepwater drilling, but we have now reached the point where we have, in my view, reduced those risks,” Salazar said.

ABC News notes that despite the Obama Administration’s lifting the moratorium six weeks ahead of schedule, “[A] combination of bureaucratic and technological hurdles means it will be months before most of the two dozen rigs idled by the moratorium resume drilling

“They [the oil industry and congressional allies] miss the point: The issue isn’t about a slowdown but a startup,” Los Angeles Times quotes Jason Grumet, president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington research group that has advocated lifting the moratorium. “Interior, with a lot of input from the oil industry, has set up new regulations. Standing up that new architecture is a first step for government and industry, and it will take some time.”

Forest Service estimates US forests locking up 190+ million tons of carbon annually

The USDA Forest Service released new estimates of the total carbon storage of U.S. forests, highlighting the important role America’s forests play in the fight against climate change. According to the new data, 41.4 billion metric tons of carbon is currently stored in the nation’s forests, and due to both increases in the total area of forest land and increases in the carbon stored per acre, an additional 192 million metric tons of carbon are sequestered each year. The additional carbon sequestered annually offsets roughly 11 percent of the country’s industrial greenhouse gas emissions, the equivalent of removing almost 135 million passenger vehicles from the nation’s highways. (Read more)

Hal Lewis Resigns From The American Physical Society

This letter of resignation from the American Physical Society by Dr. Harold Lewis is being placed on science and environmental blogs. Highlights and emphasis have been added by me.

From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara

To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society

6 October 2010

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.

Hal

———————————————
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making)

The Week’s Environmental News

The White House will go solar…again

It’s déjà vu all over again. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu, announced plans to install solar panels and a solar hot water heater on the roof of the White House Residence, “a project that demonstrates American solar technologies are available, reliable, and ready for installation in homes throughout the country.” This is not the first time the White House has tried to use “renewable energy.” The Huffington Post noted, “[President] Carter in the late 1970s spent $30,000 on a solar water-heating system for West Wing offices.” No word if they had been left on the roof if the 32 solar panel would yet have paid for the investment; in 1986, President Reagan had them removed them for a resurfacing of the roof.

10:10 UK lays video turd in environmental punchbowl

The folks at 10:10UK.org unveiled a video titled, “No Pressure” which, frankly, stunk. As James Delingpole wrote on October 1 in the Telegraph, “[The No Pressure script by Richard Curtis] makes the Vicar of Dibley look like a collaboration between Oscar Wilde and Shakespeare.”

Marc Morano former communications director for Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) was more charitable, “I think the idea of a comedy is fine, and even the gore and blood is part of our pop culture,” he told Greenwire. “What is not fine, and what is actually very revealing, is that their impulse — the intellectual strain that runs through the alarmist movement — is to try to silence their critics.”

10:10 UK’s director has issued an apology saying, “I am very sorry for our mistake and want to reassure you that we will do everything in our power to ensure it does not happen again…This media coverage for this film was not the kind of publicity we wanted for the cause of saving the climate, nor for 10:10, and we certainly didn’t mean to do anything to distract from all the efforts of those in other organisations who are working so hard to secure effective action on climate change.”

Other green groups reacted as though they had picked up something on the bottom of their collective shoes. Bill McKibben, the founder of 350.org (a group advocating lowering CO2 to 350 parts per billion in the atmosphere, and is organizing work parties for 10/10/10) wrote of the 10:10 video, “It’s the kind of stupidity that hurts our side, reinforcing in people’s minds a series of preconceived notions, not the least of which is that we’re out-of-control and out of touch…”  Gee, given that the Guardian called it “edgy,” screeners of it found it “extremely funny,” a lad says it’s okay to explode other kids for the cause, a NASA scientist says oil and coal company “CEOs should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature,” and commenters to pro-global warming posts call for the lynching of corporate executives, (I could go on), where could skeptics have picked up the idea that warmers are out of touch?

Read more here.

Coral Oasis Found In Mediterranean Desert

The Terra Daily reports that an oasis of coral has been found in a part of the Mediterranean thought to be mostly devoid of life. “The exploration vessel Nautilus, with a team of experts of the University of Haifa’s Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences , headed by Prof. Zvi Ben Avraham, discovered for the first time an area of reefs with deep-sea corals in the Mediterranean, offshore of Israel.”

6,000 New Species found in First Ever Ocean Life Census

The UPI reports, “A decade-long Census of Marine Life by 2,700 scientists from 80 countries has been completed and revealed thousands of new species…The initiative launched 570 expeditions that produced more than 2,600 academic papers and collected 30 million observations of 120,000 species. Researchers found a possible 6,000 new species, 1,200 of which have been formally described…”

Despite the good news that the world has more biodiversity than previously thought, the folks at Climate Central want you to know that every silver lining has a cloud. Michael Lemonick says the “mammoth marine census lays out what we’ve got to lose… Humans are altering the oceans through pollution and overfishing. We’re also changing the Earth’s climate by pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere — and that warms the oceans; sends glacial meltwater into the seas to change salinity and alter currents, removes the coating of ice that has been a feature of Arctic waters for hundreds of thousands of years and gradually turns seawater more acidic.”

U.S. Military Goes “Green”

Despite petroleum products having the most scalable and transportable energy available, the Pentagon thinks it might be a good idea to explore alternative energies. The New York Times Green blog reports, “The military’s renewable initiatives extend from the battlefield to the hundreds of bases and hundreds of thousands of vehicles it operates around the world.” Green reports the military has even appointed something of an “energy czar” to oversee the initiatives: Sharon E. Burke.

Don’t expect to see the military have much more success than the private sector with its massive subsidies. After all, electric cars need to be lightweight because the power density of rechargeable batteries is not as high as gasoline or diesel, and an “MRAP (mine-resistant ambush-protected) armored vehicle weighs 50,000 pounds and gets four miles per gallon.”

GM corn provides benefit to neighbors

In much the same way that a population does not need to be 100% vaccinated for non-vaccinated individuals to be protected from pathogens, researchers have found that corn genetically modified to produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) can protect neighboring fields from insects. With $2.4 billion in benefit to non-Bt fields. This benefit gets passed along to consumers. Matt Ridley, over at the Rational Optimist blog says, “Higher profits for farmers means lower costs for consumers (think about it: competition can drive prices lower and effectively pass on the extra profits as savings). So GM crops are leading to higher yields which means ploughing less land, cheaper food and more insect life, which means more bird life.” And Ronald Bailey at Reason.com says, “This beneficial pest reduction effect has also been reported in cotton crops in the U.S. and China. Maybe some day organic growers will stop worrying about a little bit of harmless pollen drift from biotech crops and welcome the pest protection spillover benefits provided by their biotech farmer neighbors.”

Those are the best environmental stories I found last week. Did you notice others? Did you have a different take on these? Leave a comment and let me know what you think.